INVERTED SYNTAX

  • The Fissured Tongue Series
    • Fissured Tongue Volume 2
    • Fissured Tongue Volume 1
    • Online Issue Two
    • Online Issue One
  • Store
  • Submit
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Sublingua Prize for Poetry
    • The Art of the Postcard
  • Sublingua 2020 Results
    • Sublingua 2019 Results
  • The Art of the Postcard
    • Art of the Postcard Issue 3
    • Art of the Postcard Issue 2
    • Art of the Postcard Issue 1
  • Interviews
  • Blog
  • Nominations & Awards
    • Pushcart Prize
    • Best of the Net
    • Best Micro Fiction
  • Resources
    • Writing resources
    • Mile-High MFA >
      • Mile-High MFA Writers
      • Mile-High MFA Website
      • Faculty News & Interviews
  • About Us
    • Masthead
    • Our Contributors
    • Mission
    • Join our team
  • The Fissured Tongue Series
    • Fissured Tongue Volume 2
    • Fissured Tongue Volume 1
    • Online Issue Two
    • Online Issue One
  • Store
  • Submit
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Sublingua Prize for Poetry
    • The Art of the Postcard
  • Sublingua 2020 Results
    • Sublingua 2019 Results
  • The Art of the Postcard
    • Art of the Postcard Issue 3
    • Art of the Postcard Issue 2
    • Art of the Postcard Issue 1
  • Interviews
  • Blog
  • Nominations & Awards
    • Pushcart Prize
    • Best of the Net
    • Best Micro Fiction
  • Resources
    • Writing resources
    • Mile-High MFA >
      • Mile-High MFA Writers
      • Mile-High MFA Website
      • Faculty News & Interviews
  • About Us
    • Masthead
    • Our Contributors
    • Mission
    • Join our team

Inverted Syntax Blog

A Letter From the Editor on Issue Two

11/20/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture


​"In this issue, we bring our readers conversations that are enlivened when read as a whole, that speak to our deepest subconscious desires about our mortality. They speak from a space of timelessness — works fused into unison, into one voice. 

​We believe, once you let yourself enter this space, your senses start reaching outside the imposed language lines and you experience language and art as a map to the subconscious at work in our lives."

Putting an issue together is about building a language — a way in which we seek to be understood. Inverted Syntax's editorial team discovered work that came over the transom that reminded us of how writing and art must be created: unflinching, resisting conformity and complacency, taking memorable, unorthodox approaches to the canons of art and language and work that turns us inside out and conveys something more about the human experience. 

The work we received and chose functions best when read as a whole. Together, the issue is one that reforms language and art with electrifying consternation that you will readily embrace. 


For me, Inverted Syntax is the idea that we are always alive in art and text. Most of us are taught to envision existence as something that is here and now, visible and tangible. The pieces selected for Online Issue Two offer a mere glimpse into our stunning Print Issue Two, in which we invite readers to step outside of themselves and expand their definitions of what is real and what is possible. Issue Two builds on mapping the subconscious working through visual and textual arts. It presents the idea that humans everywhere are in conversation with each other, that when you pay attention to those conversations, when they are  aligned just right, they can reveal answers to something more.

Art and literature in Issue Two thus become the medium within which we can come close to our sense of life and death. The issue confirms that feeling you get that no one is ever really "gone," but they are there, behind a layer, a wallpaper. That like a wallpaper, art and text hide the other layers of existence. That, when viewed in alignment, can transport us right into a different dimension. The issue carries this motif throughout by inviting readers to enter, explore, play, and ultimately, to look for connections, conversations between the texts and the art.

And we hope that when you, dear reader,
 connect the dots between our curated multiple works by multiple creators, you will discover yourself in them and discover you are not just here but you are everywhere, you too are alive in our text and you will come close to answers about your existence.

With love,
Nawal


Issue Two Editors
Nawal Nader-French, Editor
Jesica Davis, Assistant Editor 
Allissa Hertz, Editorial Assistant
Melanie Merle, Editorial Assistant
And Schuster, Editorial Assistant 
0 Comments

The Taste of Earned Fruit: Writing with Abstractions in Poetry

9/18/2018

 
Picture"Bowl of Apples" Acrylic on Canvas by Pj Holliday, 2016
by Pj Holliday

When I began writing poetry, I had the tendency to fill the lines with abstractions that left my classmates with the difficult task of understanding the poem. We’ve all heard numerous times how an overuse of abstractions does not allow the reader to grasp your meaning. We’ve heard how concepts such as love, freedom, and hope have meanings that are too subjective and should be avoided when writing poetry. But for me, being able to use abstract concepts in my writing has allowed me to come closer to shaping the expression I want readers to experience. That is, an impression of the visceral through language. And yet I know there aren’t words that can ever deliver the true elements of my experiences. For years, I did not understand how to write from the perspective of the reader -- my poetry would consist solely of abstractions, and the responses were always the same: that I needed to anchor the feelings to something concrete. I was told that it wasn’t realistic to envision that any human would be able to understand terms like grief without an image of what grief looks like to me. Language is flawed when it comes to sharing experience, but for me, through the use of abstraction in poetry, I think it comes close as possible.

As an artist inspired by cubists, expressionists, and impressionists, I enjoy looking at ways I can let my imagination artistically capture the mood, the light, and the shape of a thing, a person, or a place. In abstract art, the concrete is broken and image is distorted. It’s as if you’ve peeled an apple, which has then lost the security of its coating. The core of the apple is vulnerable both to the way in which it was peeled and to the perspective of the person who took its skin.

As a poet, I feel similarly about letting my mind create a world from my subconscious. Ezra Pound famously said to “go in fear of abstractions,” arguing instead that the image should be described in its purest state. As in visual art, when I abstract lines in my poetry, my imagination feels free to create a world outside the expected frame. Abstracting lines means that I can come up with the wildest metaphors, then rework them into the thing I am creating.

Still, abstraction without imagery, I am told, is not enough -- especially when it presents a unique challenge for the reader to interpret meaning. I often find myself being pulled back to address meaning and from where the meaning is derived. When that happens, I ask myself: Am I allowed to create something that makes the reader work for the so-called meaning? How do we define what is undefinable?  It’s as though there must be a reward at the end of writing an abstract piece of work. Are abstractions then most powerful when they are earned? That is, when the poet has reached deep enough to connect it to something concrete, allowing the reader to better experience the visceral through language?

This experience of the concrete through the abstract -- this “taste of earned fruit,” as I like to call it -- is what I now strive to work toward in my poems. It is a term derived from a moment in my favorite professor’s office. She said, “PJ, what you wrote here is not concrete enough, but because of the line above it, you’ve earned the use of this abstraction.”  It is delivering my interpretation of an open-ended concept. If the reader can experience that hard-to-define abstraction from my perspective as a writer, then I have earned the satisfaction that comes with using abstraction to allow the reader to come close to connecting to my experience.

Typically, when the meaning of a line is elusive to the reader, it tends to be described as abstract. But meaning is a subjective and wandering thing that appears at different times in different minds and changes all the time. Why then should it matter how abstraction is used, when not everyone will receive the meaning in the same way? But it is possible, I have discovered, to bring a sense of satisfaction to the reader with an elusive abstracted line by anchoring the abstraction to something specific.

While what I wish to express cannot always be captured in words, words are how I convey my deepest pains and joys. And I have learned that if I want to bring my pains and joys to the world, then I have to create them in a way which allows others to access them.  I have often heard that if I am the only one able to experience my work, then I have not dug deep enough to create a good poem. “The English language would be without some of its most memorable poets,” writes Rabi Shankar, if abstractions were written off completely (In Praise of Abstraction). Using Wallace Stevens’s poem,  “On This Beautiful World,” Shankar helps us explore abstraction. In this poem, we witness Stevens’ effective use of the abstract because he associates it with the concrete:

                          The lecturer
      On This Beautiful World Of Ours composes himself
                  and hems the planet rose

The poem attempts to promote the sensation of abstraction of beauty. While the language choices initially create abstraction through what feels like syntactic confusion, the specificity of the color, rose, the character of the lecturer, and the verb to hem all work together for a full visceral experience for the reader. We often think when an abstraction occurs in a thing of beauty, or is associated with a thing of beauty, the beauty of the thing is lost. Beauty as an abstract concept is one which does not hold finite meaning. The poem that attempts to define “A beautiful world” through concrete image is one where poet and reader discover this beautiful world through abstraction. And the poet has earned the fruit of his effort. “Because at the middle, if only in sense and in that enormous sense, merely enjoy.”

Because the thing that makes a beautiful world is subjective. It’s just as subjective as identifying the thing that makes a beautiful poem.  Without abstraction, we would never be able to discover those to-be-avoided cliché truths about beauty, love, and freedom for ourselves. With abstractions we can instead be conduits, completely disappearing as the subconscious takes over to bring the writer's world to light. Within those spaces, where the abstraction and concrete meet to create the metaphysical, the reader can finally know how to experience my interpretation of grief, love or beauty. Without definite or fixed meaning, the reader can still experience the blood-pumping sensation that comes when allowed access to the taste of the poem; that is, the taste of earned fruits.

Related Readings:
Ravi Shankar’s In Praise of Abstraction: Moving Beyond Concrete Imagery“
​The Ultimate Poem Is Abstract” by Wallace Stevens  



Hybridity beyond written forms: Integrating text and art

8/14/2018

1 Comment

 
By Jesica Carson Davis
Picture
Since I got my first digital camera in 2001, I’ve been thinking about ways to integrate words and imagery. Until recently, my concern was focused on how to mix poetry and photographs, with some attempts more successful than others, but in the last couple years, I’ve expanded my inquiry to additional media and dimensions.

This has included making poemboxes (sculptural interpretations of my poetry that usually involve a box), playing with geoboard poetry, collaging image with text, and including text when painting and sculpting. When you have another medium to incorporate beyond the written word, one you interact with using your more physical body, such as drawing or assembling, it helps you to approach the work from a new perspective.

Sometimes I am literally holding words in my hands. How does that feel, how does it differ from just reading them? Do some words weigh more than others? How can I embody what poem fragments like “blue stone” or “compilation of silhouettes” or “body as shelter” mean in the work, visually, not just linguistically? When we convey meaning beyond words can comprehension work at a more fundamental, primal level?
Lately, my joy in creating hybrid works is playing with their physical presence: I want words I can touch, turn over in my hands instead of just seeing them. Wondering how to translate a poem into a sculptural format was how my poembox project began. Sometimes I write sentences on pieces of ribbon and wind them around a geoboard to see how fragmentation and viewing from different angles changes the way I experience a piece. 

I’ve made poems as flowcharts and mind maps (similar to some of the work in DIAGRAM magazine), chopped up a paragraph into small pieces and mixed it with dirt, played with spreadsheet poetry (inspired by work like Jamie Mortara’s “Parse Table”), buried a prose poem in the ground, wrapped lines into scrolls to sleep with them under my pillow, and used a wooden box with 31 paper slots as a daily writing prompt (asking: what gap do I want to fill today?).

​
Picture
Objects can invoke non-verbal associations: symbols, the collective unconscious, etc. Anything can become an ingredient in your art, but not much starts as a totally blank slate. How can use of materials with pre-existing connotations enhance or affect a piece of work? What happens when you add text to the mix?

Of course, people have been creating mixed- or multimedia art for many years. But assigning these labels tends to focus on ingredients, prepares the mind to experience a piece based on its raw materials, potentially making it more difficult to see the whole through the sum of its parts.

If we instead speak of a piece that goes beyond text to span several media as hybrid, perhaps we can better focus on its holistic composition than the boundaries it incorporates or transcends. Would that change how we experience a piece of completed art? Would it change the way you’d want to compose new work?

There is no limit to ways you can play with integrating your words with the three-dimensional world. If you could carve one sentence into a stick, what would it say? Can you make a shape with clay or play-doh and then write a poem about its existence? What if you gave yourself $5 and 10 minutes in a thrift store to make a visual collaged poem? What would a poem look like as a movie? As a comic book?
​

Taking words off the page and onto unexpected materials gives us new ways to process their potential, to uncover what they mean to us. Working outside your comfort zone can be intimidating at first, but that’s the point: to see what grows from exploration of unexpected places. That’s one of the beautiful things about hybridity: it can include whatever you need it to.
Picture
1 Comment

The Art of Resistance

7/3/2018

 
By Jesica Carson Davis
Picture
I used to loathe political poetry, found it to be tedious and lecturing. Too often, it seemed to focus on the outrage and demands, a didacticism that results in rhetoric of lyricism at the sacrifice of the poetic. Political poetry also didn't feel like it had much to do with me. Perhaps I had been previously looking in the wrong places, attempting to connect with protest poems from the 1960’s, written before I was born. No wonder I didn’t feel an emotional, creative, or intellectual connection.

However, in the months after the 2016 election, a majority of the writing that came out of me could be tagged as political poetry, and I haven’t been able to stop writing it since. I process thoughts through the written word, so I turned to poetry in an attempt to make sense of a world that felt like it was crumbling around me. I wrote with no attention to form or meter. I wrote to work through—and work out—a feeling of impending doom, chaos, and persecution.

Eventually I looked at my notes, all those rough drafts, and wondered if I could turn them into poetry by emphasizing images and elements, balancing emotions and concrete situations. Could I make something potentially beautiful from the ugliness I saw and felt? Even if I couldn’t, my attempts made me feel less stuck. I’ve written a sonnet on birth control, poems on the prison industrial complex, and made a poembox about Claudia Rankine’s Citizen, among other things.

Creative writing, especially the language of poetry, has the power to transform thinking and is a testament for the necessity of poetry in times of crisis. Amidst walls erected in the name of public safety, children interned and separated from their families, people of color who are shot by police, the erosion of health care and impending loss of choice over our own bodies, poems of protest and resistance can empower us to transform our world. When we the people resist being categorized by politics, we cross the boundaries imposed upon us, and we are open to accepting our differences.

And as Chad Bennett says in his piece, “Why Are More Americans Reading Poetry Right Now?” “…poems often nourish questions more than answers. Poems tend to foster uncertainty. Poems cultivate mixed feelings.” Poetry can help us become more comfortable living in an uncertain space, teach us to hold and evaluate conflicting beliefs without our heads exploding. In times of crisis, poetry is there for us.

As most of life is more gray than black and white, there is another option between these diametric poles: make some art. Try doing it outside of your chosen form(at) or genre. If you’re a writer, try painting. If you’re a photographer, make an assemblage sculpture about what’s coming into your life right now. Write a Villanelle about how the world feels like it’s on fire, then write a Tanka about that gorgeous, looming moon. Then rewrite them breaking the forms. Get together with other creative people and talk, create things while you are together, plan and execute projects to keep you making art. If you’re open to it, do a poetry ritual, or cast what could be thought of as a spell, which brings us back to the power of language. Just keep creating and talking, especially about the hard stuff. Invite a change, or at least attention, pour light where before there was darkness.

Creating something against inhumane policies takes strength and means standing up and saying who you are, that your life matters, that others lives matter.

Sometimes we have to write things just to get them out to help ourselves—focus on the process over the product and make something new without worrying about how it’s going to look when it’s finished. Now is your time to get your creativity out. Turn it into a force of reckoning.

So this July 4th, start a creative revolution in your life. It’ll be a revolution for you as much as for others. You never know who will be paying attention. You may bring something into the world that someone really needs. Speak to your power. Do something creative, begin by doodling or a writing a journal entry. Write a poem in a notebook, sketch your own face in the mirror, play with clay or paints. Express what the hell is going on in and around you.

It is easy to feel defeated by current policies and decisions, but you can resist through your creativity. Keep making noise and practice using your voice. Figure out how to listen, how your own voice might be best expressed, and what you want to say. Then say it, say it again, and keep saying it until you see change begin.

Further reading suggestions:
​Look, Solmaz Sharif
​
Don’t Call Us Dead, Danez Smith
Citizen, Claudia Rankine
Nature Poem, Tommy Pico
There Are More Beautiful Things Than Beyoncé, Morgan Parker
The January Children, Safia Elhillo
Night Sky with Exit Wounds, Ocean Vuong
Seam, Tarfia Faizullah
Milk, Dorothea Lasky
Wade in the Water, Tracy K. Smith
#NoMorePresidents at Heavy Feather Review
​
Learn more about Jesica Carson Davis and her work here.

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    June 2020
    March 2020
    November 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018

    Categories

    All
    Abstraction
    Abstraction In Poetry
    Ada Limon
    Adrianne Kalfopoulou
    Adrienne Rich
    African-American
    Allissa Hertz
    Allissa Woodson
    A Manual For Cleaning Women
    American Beauty
    Anais Nin
    Andrea Rexilius
    And Schuster
    Annie Dillard
    Art
    Associative Thoughts
    Associative Writing
    At The Inkwell
    BIPOC
    Black Lives Matter
    Bluest Eye
    Bluets
    Brenda Miller
    CAConrad
    Chapbook
    Chip Livingston
    Collage
    Color
    Community
    Concrete Imagery
    Creativity
    Cross-categorization
    Danielle Ferrara
    David Bowie
    David Hicks
    David Lazar
    Deborah Shapiro
    Dennis Potter
    Denver
    Denver Events
    Denver Writes
    Diana Khoi Nguyen
    Dikeou Pop-Up
    Dorothea Lasky
    E.C. Kelly
    Elizabeth Bishop
    Elizabeth Hellstern
    Erasures
    Eric Baus
    Estafania Munoz
    Eudora Welty
    Experimental Writing
    Experimentation
    FBOMB
    Fiction
    Film
    Found Poetry
    Frank O'Hara
    Gabrielle Lessans
    Genre
    Ghost Of
    Ginny Short
    Hybrid
    Hybridity
    Hybrid Writing
    Identity
    Iggy Pop
    Imitation
    Implicit Bias
    “In Praise Of Abstraction"
    Inverted Syntax
    Issue Three
    Issue Two
    Jamie Mortara
    Jesica Carson Davis
    Kathryne Lim
    Kathryn Winograd
    Kathy Fish
    Kevin Spacey
    Launch
    Letter
    Lighthouse Writer’s Workshop
    Literary Citizen
    Literary Events
    Literary Journal
    Literary Magazine
    Lucia Berlin
    Lucy Findley
    Maggie Nelson
    Manet
    Mapping Subconscious
    Meet The Mags Volume 2
    Melanie Merle
    Metaphor
    #MeToo Movement
    MFA
    Mile High MFA
    Mile-High MFA
    Mile-High Review
    Mule
    Muriel Spark
    Music
    Natalie Goldberg
    Nawal Nader French
    Nawal Nader-French
    New Years Letter
    New York School Of Writers
    No Justice: No Peace
    Nonfiction
    Nongenre
    Performance
    Personal Experience
    Philip Metres
    Pj Holliday
    Poems In Programing Language
    Poetry
    Poetry Reading
    Poetry Ritual
    Political Poetry
    Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome
    Prose Sonnet
    Publishing Industry
    Publishing Practices
    Punchapalooza
    Punch Drunk Press
    Punketry
    Rachel Weaver
    Ravi Shankar
    Raw Fury
    Reading
    Reading Events
    Readings
    Redacted
    Rejection
    Resist
    Review
    Rocky Mountain Fiction Writers
    Salon Des Refusés
    Sexuality
    Shane McCrae
    Soap Operas
    Sophfronia Scott
    Source Code Poetry
    Stain'd
    Submit
    Submitting
    Submitting Life
    Suzanne Paola
    Syntax Physic Opera
    Ted Downum
    Telepoem
    Tell It Slant
    The Singing Detective
    Tom Phillips
    Toni Morrison
    Unmanageable
    Wallace Stevens
    Welcome
    William S. Burroughs
    Words Beyond Bars
    Writers
    Writing
    Writing Advice
    Writing Buddy
    Writing Exercise
    Writing Life
    Writing Practice

    RSS Feed

online issue Two
print issues
​art of the postcard
blog
   About
    ​Masthead
    Submit 
    Subscribe
​
    Awards
Contact 
Join Our Team
​Resources
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2018-2020 ​INVERTED SYNTAX PRESS LLC.  ​
​ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
P.O. BOX 2044, LONGMONT, COLORADO, 80502 , USA  PHONE: 970. 614. 5774